I need your
help. I’ve been ego-googling, or rather, naval gazing à la internet; checking out
what happens when I enter my name in Google, or that of my novel, Glass Houses.
This shameful pursuit, talked only of in hushed voices, is in truth, generally
accepted as a necessary tool to assessing a writer’s ‘profile’. If I am to
persuade a publisher of my potential to move from dedicated writer to published
author, I have to show that I have the profile and the ability to help promote and
ultimately sell my books. After all, it doesn’t matter how big the book could be,
if nobody knows it’s available to buy.
Jackie Buxton
is doing OK, thank you. I can’t claim the swimming prowess of JB from the South
Axholme Sharks nor the brain of Professor JB specialising in Post-modernism but
Jackie Buxton - the writer is out there vying for the Google top spot.
Not so, Glass
Houses, however. My completed manuscript is buried, it would appear, in the
deepest inner core of planet Google. It’s way behind independent companies
offering our plants a lifeline and boasting generous discounts, as well as a
primary school with only 67 pupils. I can’t tell you exactly where my Glass
Houses appears, having called a halt to the search after the 26th
page of results.
It didn’t fare
any better when I searched for Glass Houses, the book. Although the time wasn’t
entirely wasted as I felt compelled to buy Glass Houses by Rachel Caine after clicking
through so many recommendations and promotions - even though it’s really a book
for teenagers and I can’t attest to being one of those, and I’m not knowingly a
fan of vampire stories either.
There is no
need to panic. Why would my book be a top response when it isn’t even available
to purchase yet? We’re also advised not to be too precious about our manuscript’s
title as it’s bound to be changed by the publisher under the advice of their
marketing arm. But the publishing world is undoubtedly tough and part of me can’t
help thinking that a title which would intrigue in the book shops, and which
wasn’t a potentially tired repeat of a name already used, might keep a publisher’s
interest a moment longer – and who knows, perhaps that’s the moment when the
publisher decides that this book isn’t going in the rejection pile.
Changing the
name of my book does have its drawbacks.
Glass Houses has enjoyed small success in competitions and would be
recognisable to some loyal souls from Authonomy and Litopia, some of the writer’s
sites in which I’ve been involved, as well as my reader friends in real life
and on Twitter. I wouldn’t suggest it has a fan base but Glass Houses is certainly
known to some.
Perhaps it’s foolish
to essentially start again. But if there
already is a very successful Glass Houses out there, we’re going to have to
start again at some point anyway, so why not now?
My original
title for Glass Houses was ‘Knock for Knock’. I felt that Glass Houses was
catchier and although only superficially giving an idea of the theme of the
book, the theme was definitely less obvious in the name, Knock for Knock.
Familiarity can breed contempt however, and I’m left wondering if Knock for
Knock has more clout.
How many
other books called Knock for Knock appear in a Google search? None.
I’m desperate
to tell you why I chose Knock for Knock as a title but that wouldn’t be fair.
Searching on-line or in a book shop, you wouldn’t be privy to this information
and this is where I’d like to ask you to mentally put yourselves now. You’ve
been given a book voucher for your birthday. The deal is: you have to buy a
book from a new author. Glass Houses and Knock for Knock are side by side on
display. Fixing only on the title, which would you pick up first? Perhaps you wouldn’t
pick up either? I’d love to know why not.
Regardless of
the choices on offer, you may feel it would be too risky to change a book title
at this stage.
Whatever your
reaction, I’d love to know. It will help me make my decision and I’ll report
back next time.
Thank you!